6255918 Complaint Arch V USC

Federal Statutes
Ease 2:19-cv-06964 Document 1 Filed 08/09/19 Page 1 of 18 PagelD#:! Jeffrey R. Groendal, Bar No. 254097 igroendal@klinedinstlaw.com KLINEDINST PC Los Angeles, California 90017 Ronald P. Schiller (pro hac vice motion to follow) rschiller@hangley.com Sharon F. McKee (pro hac vice motion to follow) smckee@hangley.com HANGLEY ARONCHICK SEGAL PUDLIN & SCHILLER One Logan Philadelphia, Square, 27th Floor Pennsylvania 19103 Attorneys for Plaintiff ARCH SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ARCH SPECIALTY INSURANCE Case No. 2:19-cv-6964 COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, Defendant. 1. In this insurance action, Arch Specialty Insurance Company ("Arch") seeks a declaration that the excess healthcare professional liability policies that it issued to the University of Southern California ("USC") include an Abuse or Molestation Exclusion, which bars claims otherwise covered under the underlying policies. Arch would not have issued its excess policy without this exclusion, and USC accepted this contract term. While USC had ample opportunity to object if it Dase 2:19-cv-06964 Document 1 Filed 08/09/19 Page 2 of 18 PagelD#:2 believed that the Abuse or Molestation Exclusion had been included in error, for nearly two years USC never did until it realized that it was facing charges of abuse spanning decades…
Open in the reader →